Product Reviews

I had previously sent an email to you stating that this is a very innovative product for the shooter who wants to practice reloads of various types . I use this at home; and, at the range for practice exercises before I go to live fire. This saves the wear and tear on my 2011 magazines, which are fairly expensive, and reduces the need to dedicate mags for reload practice of any nature. No need to retune a magazine that has hit the ground before a match. Frank Forsha

This review relates to the entire Lynx Belt System. It's a great idea but it ends up poorly (for me). The pouches and the holster simply don't sit stable if I mount them directly on the link centers (they will wiggle back and forth), and if I mount them on the edge of two links it will impact the fitting of the belt at that position. The buckle itself is nice in theory as well, in practice it often happened that the rubber ring flew away when closing and in general the buckle does not hold the belt stable enough. The rubber creates moreless a weak bindage and I'm afraid that it will break soon (probably why some replacement rubbers are delivered - which is nicely, but if they are NEEDED it just counters the general idea). Overall I will probably convert back to the "original" belt system, even though I really love the idea of being able to reduce the packsize compared to the stiff belts. It's a pity. [DAA Reply]: Thank you for your feedback Jens. Some of our customers found that attaching the mag pouches to the link hinges (i.e. in between two links) has solved that problem and unless you are running a VERY small belt size, say 25" or smaller, it won't affect the placement or the binding between the outer and inner belt. Try that for a little while and see how that works for you.

This is the ultimate tool for cleaning the compensator, I can’t believe with a very low price, the material actually very strong.

Using it on 6.5cm with h4350 it is not repeatable. All powder charges were verified on a sartorius scale with resolution to 0.02 grain, about 1 kernel of powder. The daa powder check sometimes sounded off and sometimes not on verified charges. After the powder was weighed on the sartorius scale the case was filled thru a forester long neck powder funnel then placed back in the Dillon 750 for further cycle . The first of which was the daa powder check. The brass end of the daa powder check would not fit thru the case neck so I had to use the plain rod end. There should be something in between using the plain steel end of the rod and the supplied larger brass end which was too big for the 6.5cm case neck. A bigger foot over the plain steel rod end may have been more repeatable. Also the sensitivity of finding the sweet spot of the alarm can be a pain to find with the rod setting on a good powder charge. By the time you get the wrench into the magnet set screw you are compressing the powder charge, which makes the adjustment of the magnet void. Even pulling the rod out, marking magnet location and then adjusting magnet position was no help. They should have kept the sensitivity adjustment screw on the unit itself, or one that fine adjusts the center point of the go and no go point of the height range. In short they need to come up with another brass end that will fit 223 and 6.5, they need to come up with a fine screw adjustment on the daa not the rod that adjusts the center point of the magnet sweet spot of the desired powder charge. As it now comes it may be 50% reliable, but 50% for a alarm is not acceptable. Concept is good, it just is not ready for prime time, needs more refinement. Tried for a 50% rating in stars like the unit performs but the program will not allow, so I settled at 2.

Works good but it does leave a white residue but not as much as other similar products.

These are nice pasters that work as advertised. They do stick better than most other pasters out there.